Gotherington Slip – what happens next?
article by: Ian Crowder
posted on: 07 May 2010
updated on: 21 August 2010
The land slip at Gotherington is an inconvenience and signifcant
challenge for the Honeybourne Line, but it's no reason to be
downbeat. In this interview with our website editor, Ian
Crowder, the railway's chairman Malcolm Temple explains that all
the stops are being pulled out to remedy the problem, but warns
that there is no quick fix.
IC: First things first, how was the slip
discovered?
MT: Well, in fact a problem was initially
spotted by volunteers doing some electrical work at Gotherington
signal box. It looked as if there was a slight dip developing
beneath the outer edge of the unused track on the run-round loop,
south of the box. But there was no sign of any slippage on
the embankment itself. Later a routine track inspection
showed that the dip had grown so the drivers of service trains were
asked to pass at a very slow speed as a precaution with both the
Property (Darren Fairley) and Operations (Neil Carr) Directors
supervised each train over the affected area, watching for any
movement. The dip seemed only to be localised and was
not close to the running line. This was on Thursday April
22nd.
Next day Darren and Neil undertook a number of close
inspections throughout the day and as there appeared to be
significant change in the dip, with movement progressing closer to
the running line, we decided to suspend services south of
Gotherington with immediate effect. A void had appeared to
form under the loop and was reaching out towards the running line
with ballast falling away not just from under the loop but from the
shoulder of the main line too.
IC: Was that a hard decision to make?
MT: Well, it was an unpleasant decision but the
safety of our staff and visitors is our top priority. Given
that the ground looked unstable, even though it was evidently not
initially affecting the running line, we had no choice but to do
that. It was the right decision as the slip has moved further
as days have passed.
Fortunately, the coming weekend was our very successful Thomas
event when all the activity happens between Toddington and
Winchcombe, which gave time to develop contingency plans -
including new timetables and operating arrangements, with trains
top-and-tailed and terminating at Gotherington.
Details are on this website.
IC: This has clearly put a lot of pressure on
our volunteers…
MT: It has and I would like to acknowledge the
amazing team spirit that has seen everyone pulling together to make
sure that the show goes on. It is bad news, but we definitely
aren't downbeat - everyone has been positive in finding practical
solutions. We're still giving our visitors great value for
money and already people are saying they enjoy the novelty of
topping and tailing. In fact for normal days, you get a
longer train journey as each trip runs
Toddington-Winchcombe-Gotherington-Winchombe-Gotherinton-Winchcombe
and back to Toddington. Four trips through the tunnel!
IC: What about GWR175?
MT: That show goes on, too. We had an
emergency meeting and it's clear that apart from the timetable and
operating procedure, little else changes in terms of the
attraction. We're going to put on a fantastic show that
really does do justice to the 175th anniversary of the
Great Western. A dozen locos will be working - and a dozen
more on display: where else can you find a show like that? We
are looking at additional local car parking and a bus service from
Cheltenham for those coming by public transport.
IC: Back to the slip, what's happening on the
site now?
MT: Our very capable properties director,
Darren Fairley, is managing the investigation. We've
contracted engineers who are well known in the rail industry, and
to our insurers, to carry out trial bores and surveys. The
full results aren't known yet, but it has shown that a large cavity
has opened up within the embankment and over a much longer area
than at first thought. We think that there have been problems
here through history, there's evidence of past repair work to the
embankment in the form of rock baskets (gabions) in pace at the
foot of the embankment. The ground is naturally wet here
while the geology on the Cotswold escarpment is a complex legacy of
the Ice Age, which does produce ground movement. It is likely
that a combination of both has caused the problem, not helped
by the exceptionally cold winter.
What is important, though, is that the repair is carried out in
a way that secures the embankment for good so that future
generations can be confident that this won't happen again. We
are taking the best possible professional advice on modern (and
efficient) techniques to stabilise the embankment, using experience
gained with similar slips and geology elsewhere.
IC: These days, problems always seem to
be 'someone's fault' - but you aren't casting any blame?
MT: No, absolutely not. In fact it's
worth repeating that there is no issue with the quality of our
track work, the permanent way team have done an extraordinary job
in developing and maintaining our ten miles of line to the highest
standard. It's a bit of an over-used term but: "it's
just one of those things" that from time to time affect railways up
and down the country and I'm certain that this experience will give
us valuable pointers towards maintenance of all our other
embankments.
IC: When do you expect to get a full report
into the extent of the damage and what needs to be done to repair
the embankment?
MT: There is a lot of work still to do
including a period of monitoring the movement, which by
nature has to be given time. This will build into a plan
of action before any thought of moving the diggers in but I expect
to be better informed within the next three weeks or so.
Tempting as it is, speculation isn't helpful - I'd rather be able
to say exactly what's going to happen when we have taken all the
professional advice we need.
IC: Is there any short term remedial action
that could at least get trains going again over the affected piece
of embankment?
MT: No - there is no quick fix. Far
better that we do the job properly and permanently, regardless of
how long that might take.
IC: Have you had any indications of what it
will cost?
MT: I'm not going to speculate here either -
but it will be costly.
IC: Is it something that our insurers will
contribute towards?
MT: I am in discussion with our insurers and
they have are monitoring the progress being made by the engineers
and consulting with them, but the short answer is, I don't
know.
IC: Are there other sources for meeting the
potential cost?
MT: There are, and so far I have approached
more than a dozen potential funding sources, including possible
European funding. Many of these sources just don't have cash
available; we are exploring possibilities with others. We are
also considering using a fund raising specialist to help explore
potential sources of help.
IC: This isn't on the same scale as the Severn
Valley Railway's experience following their 2007 flood damage but
is there potential for a national appeal which was so successful
for them?
MT: There is and we are pulling into
place a small working party to develop just such an appeal.
We will shortly start an appeal fund and I hope that supporters of
the railway, including members and shareholders, will
contribute. This is OUR railway and if we can all pull
together we can get the trains running all the sooner. We
have already had an approach from Steam Railway magazine
asking how they can help spread the word in the railway community
too. The heritage railway movement looks after its own, the
SVR experience proved that. We are a much loved line and I'm
sure that those who enjoy it, locally and nationally, will want to
support what we are doing. We'll publish more information
about how people can help on this website soon.
IC: Does this mean that other projects,
like the Broadway extension, are on hold?
MT: Absolutely not. Our sights are firmly
set on Broadway, going over the viaduct during GWR175 is a
fantastic demonstration of that determination. The slip is an
inconvenience that we have to deal with and certainly, our
immediate priority is to get it sorted out. But the work must
go on - we are an expanding railway and we can't let this get in
the way of our development.
IC: How can readers of this website and the
public at large help?
MT: By buying a ticket and travelling on our
trains! You might not be able to board a train at Cheltenham
Racecourse right now, but trains are running and
visitors will still enjoy a fantastic and interesting day
out. It is frustrating that some people think we are closed
completely but patently we are not.
IC: So business as usual…
MT: Most definitely, business as
usual!
Malcolm Temple is often at the railway and is always happy to
have a chat. If you have any positive thoughts or ideas click this link and let
us know your views.
4 comments for “Gotherington Slip – what happens next?”
Comment on this item