Seven work areas involved in embankment repair
article by: Ian Crowder
posted on: 18 August 2010
updated on: 22 November 2010
To aid understanding of the work involved to repair the failed
embankment at Gotherington, the area of embankment in question has
been divided into a seven sections for ease of reference.
Read these descriptions in conjunction with the following
diagrams.
Soil nailing This cross section of
the embankment shows one of the sections that will be stabilised
using soil nails. The red diagonal lines show the nails
penetrating through the embankment and into the ground beneath
(plan provided by David Symonds Associates)
Reconstruction The worst-affected
part of the embankment requires almost total replacement (plan
provided by David Symonds Associates)
Work areas A plan of the Gotherington
embankment, showing the seven specific work areas for which
contracts are now being let (plan provided by David Symonds
Associates)
All the areas show live movement (in other words, movement that
is still taking place) even if in one or two of the
sections minor rectification work is required to ensure long term
stability. The areas are defined as follows.
Definitions are given working from south to north. The
following text and the drawings have been provided by the railway's
consulting engineers, David Symonds Associates and with thanks to
properties director, Darren Fairley.
Area 1
This runs from section line 6 on the plan up as far as the
overhead electricity cables. A length of approximately
60m.
In area 1, the movement being detected is much smaller than area
2 but is live. At this stage the solution envisaged is to
soil nail the embankment to provide enhanced stability.
Area 2
This section runs from the overhead electricity cables up to the
location of borehole ref: CP11. This is the main area of slip
and is approximately 85m in length.
This is the area of the main slip where complete failure of the
embankment has occurred. At the present time design solutions
are likely to involve at least partial excavation of the failed
material and replacement with a compacted granular material.
It is possible, given the movement being detected within the area
of the main running line, that full excavation and replacement will
be required. Options for utilisation of some of the surplus
material as toe weighting will be investigated.
Area 3
This runs from borehole ref: CP11 to approximately 5m past
section line 2 on the plan. An approximate length of 30m.
Minor movement is currently recorded to this area and the design
solution is as for Area 1, to utilise soil nailing.
Area 4
This section runs from 5m past section line 2 to a point
approximately 5m north of borehole ref: CP10. An approximate
length of 15m.
There is localised movement to the face of the embankment in
this area but it is not believed that this has affected the core of
the embankment at this stage. The solution here is a
combination of local excavation and reinstatement, followed by soil
nailing of the slope.
Area 5
This section runs from 5m north of borehole ref: CP10 to a point
10m south of section line 1. An approximate length of
25m.
Movement detected, though minor. At the present time the
design solution envisaged is soil nailing as for Area 1.
Area 6
This runs from approximately 10m south of section line 1 to a
point approximately 10m north of section line 1. An
approximate length of 20m.
There is more significant deep seated movement recorded to this
area and the design solution envisaged is excavation and
reinstatement along the lines proposed for area 2.
Area 7
This runs from a point approximately 10m north of section line 1
up to the stream. A length of approximately 15m.
Movement has been detected, though currently minor. At the
present time the design solution envisaged is soil nailing, along
the lines recommended for Areas 1, 3 and 5.